Re: [wg-review] Decision D2

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

On 05:29 17/02/01 -0500, Babybows.com said:

> I ask all members of this Review WG to write directly to the
>members of the Board to express their outrage.
>

The members of this WG, who support an Individuals Constituency in the DNSO
would be well advised to come with a joint (consensus) statement directly
to the Board anyway, because according to the Bylaws it is the Board and
only the Board that decides over the acceptability and
recognition-in-principle of a constituency application.
Ken Stubs, Chair of the NC, is fully aware of this  and has argued that the
NC has no business to get involved in the admission of a new constituency.
(if I haven't phrased this right, Ken, please correct me)

Remember, the NC is  "the other constituencies".  
The Bylaws are quite correct in denying these other constituencies a Yea or
Nay say over the admittance of a new one.


--Joop--
Former bootstrap of the CA/idno
       The Polling Booth 
www.democracy.org.nz/vote1/

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html