ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [wg-review] Resumption of Review.


Yes - here is one more "Lurker in the background".

Greetings

Pete

Austria

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org 
> [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On Behalf Of Sotiropoulos
> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 3:14 AM
> To: Jefsey Morfin
> Cc: wg-review@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [wg-review] Resumption of Review.
> 
> 
> Jefsey Morfin wrote:
> 
> > Dear Sotiris,
> > I think we may understand that:
> >
> > 1. Mr Chair is tired. The burden on his shoulders is heavy. From the
> >      mail to Philip Sheppard there are probably off-list 
> promises, "if you do,
> >      don't", changes, etc... for a few hopes we shared and 
> whuch will just
> >      stay hopes. Neither you nor me have accepted his charge (we have
> >      enough friends to have voted for us). Personnally I asked 
> mine to vote
> >      for Greg. He knows that, And he knows the trust and the 
> respect I have
> >      for his effort. Bravo, Greg and thank you.
> 
> Jefsey, the job is not over, so I think it may be a little early to start
> eulogizing.  To be frank, I am more confused now about the status 
> of the "work" of
> the WGr than at any time heretofore.
> 
> > On 00:06 15/02/01, Sotiropoulos said:
> > > > If you really want to know, I'm sure the person who
> > > > suggested it will tell you, but I don't violate private 
> email for someone
> > > > who seems to think he's the Grand Inquisitor.
> > >
> > >No Greg, I don't think that, but it's obvious you do.  That's really
> > >unfortunate,
> > >as I don't remember calling you names, Mr. Chair.
> >
> > 2. Mr Chair is probably dismayed by the whole thing. I think he 
> should not.
> >      The workd done will not probably make change anything. But 
> the woven
> >      links and the acquired experience were great.
> >
> >      This is why Greg you should not fear the remarks of 
> Sotiris. There are
> >      only a few people left in here.
> 
> How many people have unsubscribed, is there a figure available?
> 
> TO ALL:  Is there anybody left on this ML.  Please respond with a 
> simple YES if
> you are still interested in the "work" of the WG-Review.
> 
> > After a few weeks, I think all cooperate
> >      with you. Nobody really argue except to make a point or if 
> Kent brings
> >      contradiction. Sotiris is plainly cooperating here as I read him.
> 
> I have tried to be as cooperative and forthcoming as possible, in 
> all aspects of
> my involvement in the WGr to-date.  If anybody has a 
> contradictory notion, then
> that is their personal conviction, but I think the record clearly 
> speaks for
> itself.
> 
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>         Hermes Network, Inc.
> 
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>