Re: [wg-review] [DNDEF] short quizz

["rob j" <junivers@sprint.ca>]

All good questions to me, Joop, and in spite of occasional torpor and
confusion, I think this WG is a perfect place to ask them. Good questions
predicate the possibility of useful answers.

Whether or not the answers are then used to formulate reasonable policy is
beyond me, but at the very least, I believe these questions help to expose
the fact there is a great deal of thought, effort and study occurring
outside the "decision loop," and making itself useful to those who must try
to pull cogent policy rabbits out of the impossible technical hat.

I take great encouragement from that, and thank you all for allowing me to
participate.

Back to my quiet place, I go...

/R

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joop Teernstra" <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>
To: "Jefsey Morfin" <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>; <wg-review@dnso.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 2:32 AM
Subject: Re: [wg-review] [DNDEF] short quizz


> At 23:51 7/02/01 +0000, Jefsey Morfin wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> 1) Creative Component -  the concept behind the language that makes up
the
> >> written title that gives rise to intellectual property rights owned by
one
> >> or more person or persons and or entity(ies). These may or may not be
> >> subject to a registered trademark.
> >
> >
> >
> > actually far more complex. The semantic, the sound, the graphisms, the
> > history are concerned.
> > The first point is what is technically the DN: what is registered in the
DNS
> > files or what is seen at the screen. Same Chinese, Japanese, Korean
ideogram
> > with similar sound are not registered with the same ascii characters in
any
> > of the current accepted transcriptions.
>
>
> Jefsey makes a number of good points here.
>
> But can this WG really come up with a definition that the courts in
France,
> Korea, China and Japan are going to respect and use, even if such a
definition
> would be accepted by the ICANN DNSO?
>
> Are we qualified to cover all those aspects that can come up in a Domain
Name
> dispute?
>
> Can our defining really help a (prospective) registrar getting a grip on
his
> potential liability for contributory infringement?
>
> This is a very interesting intellectual exercise, but is the definition
> that we
> are grasping for destined to end up in the contracts between ICANN and its
> accredited registrars?
>
>
>
>
>
> --Joop Teernstra LL.M.--
> the Cyberspace Association and
> the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
> Elected representative.
> http://www.idno.org
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html