[wg-review] Voting Rights

["Babybows.com" <webmaster@babybows.com>]

When I look at the current DNSO structural model, at the most rudimentary
level I see two groups of participants... those who by dint of their
contractual relationship with ICANN are obligated to adhere to "consensus
policies", and those who have no such contractual relationship.  I question
the wisdom of the former group having been granted "voting rights" in the
Names Council, as it would seem to me that "observer status" would be more
appropriate.  I also wonder why the GA doesn't have a large block of seats
on the Names Council as that too, in my humble opinion, seems appropriate.

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html