ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [wg-review] Names Council 3


1) The NC didn't decide on the new TLDs, the BoD did. I was there.
2) The NC only gives recommendations on DN policy.

Gawd, do I ever hate defending them, but if you are going to indict, do so
with the facts.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Dierker [mailto:Eric@HI-TEK.COM]
> Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 11:05 PM
> To: review
> Subject: [wg-review] Names Council 3
> 
> 
> This is perhaps one of the most important and yet out right 
> silly topics
> of all we address.  One harkens back to Mr. Younger and the concept of
> his son's pow wow. Is this a group that actually gives a name, or more
> accurately decides how to do it.
> I know, "read all the material leading up to the formation of the
> "Council"", oh come on it is something out of the survivor series.
> 
> Since we all gave up on the defintion of a Domain Name we can not go
> forward into this portion of the review without absurdity. Without a
> concept of Domain Name how can we possibly review the function of a
> Council in charge of handing them out. Talk about Alice in Wonderland.
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>