RE: [wg-review] Constituencies

["Dassa" <dassa@dhs.org>]

I saw the objection, didn't notice any rejection of this particular application.   However I would suggest that the solution would be to expand the number of constituencies rather than dismantling the model.

 

Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On Behalf Of Roeland Meyer
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 9:32 PM
To: review
Subject: [wg-review] Constituencies

I was just over at the NCDNHC list and guiess what? DNRC, a non-profit, just got rejected, because they also support commercial interests.Like MHSC, but for different reason, they don't fit in any other constituency either. Ergo, they are disenfranchised.

 

I can't think of a stronger argument for the abolishment of the constituency model. If we can't include everyone that controls a domain name, it shouldn't exist. A DNSO that doesn't enfranchise ALL domain name holders, is NOT a DNSO!

--
ROELAND M.J. MEYER
Managing Director
Morgan Hill Software Company, Inc.
TEL: +001 925 373 3954
FAX: +001 925 373 9781
http://www.mhsc.com
mailto: rmeyer@mhsc.com