ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[wg-review] Proposal to Restructure the DNSO


In keeping with the sentiment expressed by many that the Constituency model needs to be abandoned in favor of a structure that guards against the possibility of disenfranchising any group of interested parties, and in keeping with the terms of reference of the Review Working Group “to vindicate that DNSO would be a structure that will include all of those who will be affected by the DNS of the future as well as the current Netizens,” I am offering the following “Proposal to Restructure the DNSO” as an outline/ starting point for discussions (in the context of this current assessment of the GA by the members of the Review Working Group).

1.      The Assembly shall elect its own Chair

2.      The Assembly shall convene a Council consisting of 19 members

3.      Each current Constituency (as a legacy consideration) shall appoint one member to this Council

4.      Remaining seats to be filled by election

5.      No one Constituency shall at any time have more than three members represented on the Council

6.      The Assembly will consider policy initiatives

7.      Upon decision of the Assembly Chair, working groups, committees or other such bodies shall be created to thoroughly prepare a policy recommendation

8.      Such final recommendations are to be forwarded to the Council subsequent to a majority Assembly vote

9.      The Council will review each such policy recommendation to determine whether such document meets the criteria of a “consensus policy”.

10. The Council will make such refinements as necessary

11. If adopted by the Council with a 2/3 vote, the policy will be forwarded to the Board; if not, it will be remanded to the Assembly for further work

 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>