Re: [wg-review] Immediate vote on voting - respond plese

[Phil King <yofelipe@excite.com>]

Still running a day late reading, but count me as oposing Mr. Conant's
motion
On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 13:06:27 -0700, Greg Burton wrote:

>  At 10:30 AM 2/1/01, Derek Conant - DNSGA wrote:
>  
>  The question is here:
>  
>  >Does anyone in this WG agree that this WG should quickly address and fix
its
>  >voting process?
>  >
>  >Yes or No?
>  
>  Please reply on this thread with either "yes" or "no". I believe that 
>  sufficient bandwidth has already been expended on discussion of the
question.
>  
>  Since Mr Conant doesn't like the existing system, and thinks that 24
hours 
>  is sufficient time for leaving a vote open (as opposed to the 5 days
we're 
>  currently operating under), the vote will close 24 hours from the time of

>  his question, and will occur publicly on this thread . If a majority of 
>  respondents agree with Mr Conant, we will reopen the question. If a 
>  majority disagree, I expect Mr Conant to cease his agitation on this
matter 
>  immediately upon the conclusion of the period.
>  
>  Currently, I tally:
>  
>  For:
>  Derek Conant
>  
>  Opposed:
>  bukko
>  Greg Burton
   Phil King <yofelipe>
>  
>  
>  Regards,
>  Greg
>  working chair
>  
>  sidna@feedwriter.com
>  
>  --
>  This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
>  Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>  ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
>  Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>  


Yo, Felipe (I, Phillip)
Phil King
Butte America
(The Richest Hill On Earth)





_______________________________________________________
Send a cool gift with your E-Card
http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html