ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[wg-review] Let's Solve the Voting Matter


If we accomplish anything here with this WG, let's solve the voting
matter.

This WG looks ridiculous submitting its current process that it relies
upon for its direction.  What kind of an example to others is this
voting process the WG uses to determine its direction?

The voting matter is on the table.  Let's spend a few minutes here and
fix it.  Then, let's move forward and advance the WG.

For stronger organization, I propose the following 7 quick steps to fix
the voting matter.

1.  Scrap the current WG voting process completely.

2.  Only those who participate in submitting comments to this WG may
vote.

3.  The WG gives 24 hour notice before closing the vote process on any
subject matter.

4.  WG participants who vote are identified and counted.

5.  If WG participants do not want to be identified by their votes, then
they should not vote.

6.  The majority vote wins.

7.  A tie vote brings the WG participants back to the debate table.

Derek Conant





--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>