ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[wg-review] constituencies, 1


I address this proposition and hope that it is not taken to badly out of
context.

"The basic problem is that noone
can show agreement on how to
decide which constituencies to
form and how to integrate them
once thay are formed. While it
may have been an interesting
political experiment, it failed."

Roeland Meyer
http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-review/Arc02/msg01832
___

I have found no specific opposition to the proposition that if there is
sufficient demand by participation then any constituency should be
allowed to be formed. I believe this to be consistent with the principal
of Stakeholder representation.

As to integration: The structure is in place simply add them.  It would
appear that an increase of the numbers of board members elected from the
DNSO should be forthcoming.

Sincerely,

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>