Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Discussion

[Eric Dierker <ERIC@HI-TEK.COM>]

Desegregating the groups and combining them all into a single voting block
(assembly) with the same, or increasing, amount of voting rights as far as
members elected.  The concept being that any good idea from any group within
the assembly would be adopted by the assembly as a whole and given its' due
weight. The membership here would not be important as it would be the issues
presented that would create participation. Someone with no stake at all in an
issue would presumably not vote on such a subject. Further the elected
officials would be responsible to the group as a whole and would remain at the
popular determination of the assembly.  By popular demand issues could be
placed upon the agenda and decisions would be transparent.

Sincerely,

Greg Burton wrote:

> On 11:39 AM 1/26/01, Greg Burton said:
> (Poll results deleted)
> Due to these results, it appears to me that discussion might focus first on
> the question "If constituencies are to be abandoned altogether, what should
> replace them?"
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> sidna@feedwriter.com
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html