Re: [wg-review] IDNH/O versus @LARGE

[Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

1/29/01 2:51:52 PM, Eric Dierker <ERIC@HI-TEK.COM> wrote:

>Other than the unnecessary personal dig.  

It was not a personal "dig", she wrote it. 

>I find this statement to be correct and necessary to be
>said.  Based upon my memory and a short review, someone-somewhere-somehow slipped these two
>together.  Within this working group they were not meant that way.

That's exactly what I'm pointing out.


>As for the protocol:  It should be insured that constituency groups not be diluted by forcing them
>into the at large.  However it would appear that within the At Large, "groups" should be forming that
>can organize and build coalitions capable of affecting BoDs.

This is inevitable.



Sotiris Sotiropoulos
          Hermes Network, Inc. 


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html