Re: [wg-review] Ratification of WG Preliminary Reports - Votes and Comments

[Greg Burton <sidna@feedwriter.com>]

At 12:58 AM 1/26/01, Joop Teernstra wrote:

Thanks for your work, Joop. The adoption of this content by the WG marks a 
significant step forward for our process, and I hope that these documents 
are only the beginning.

>Preliminary Reports - 3. Constituencies and 4. GA
>The WG should approve this report             13
>The WG should not approve this report          1
>Don't know                                                  5

>Preliminary Report - Consensus
>The WG should approve this report         15
>The WG should not approve this report      2
>Don't know   4

>Preliminary Report - 11. IDNH
>The WG should approve this report       17
>The WG should not approve this report   1
>Don't know       3

Regards,
Greg

sidna@feedwriter.com

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html