RE: Legal Question - Re: [wg-review] Concerns
1/25/01 9:39:58 PM, "Joanna Lane" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>Excellent. This is a brilliant example of how it is possible to meet the
>challenge of putting ideas forward in an effective format IMHO. All it needs
>now is some documentary evidence (URLS) to establish a foundation for
>claims it makes. Then we can use it.
Joana & Eric,
I've got a few URLs for you: CORINTHIANS.COM, MADONNA.COM,
BARCELONA.COM... And the list goes on and on...
Let's have the snide remark now, I've consigned myself to such rejoinders.
Seems anything of substance any of us might have to offer is brushed aside
or ignored anyway. How about a surprise for a change?
(Considering that we're here trying to give substance to, and make some
sense of, the undefined terms that are raining down from on high... I think we
should be accorded a little more respect. Let's face it, most of us have
pretty thick skins... which is not to say the same for our skulls.)
Hermes Network, Inc.
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html