[wg-review] Re: WG-Review Teleconference notes - rev 1.

["YJ Park (MINC)" <yjpark@minc.org>]

Hello Joanna,

Thank you so much for your works!!
Can you add some more to your rev.1?

1. Time Duration for teleconference.: 3 hours [whatever time criteria]:-)

2. Motion to NC from WG-Review teleconference regarding "chair"

YJ Park, the current chair of WG-Review designated by NC, is going
to ask NC to recognize newly elected WG-Review co-chair, as formal
chair of WG-Review and YJ Park as liaison chair of WG-Review from
NC which has been well-established practice in the DNSO.

3. Call for Teleconference Proposal.

How to organize a better teleconference for the next time in order to be
as inclusive as possible overcoming time differnence and financial barrier
if ever possible language barrier will be discussed in a small volunteer
group and their recommendation from that group will be presented soon.

4. One more, more specific comments on Review TF will be added in
the next version of teleconference meeting minutes.

Thanks,
YJ

WG-REVIEW TELECONFERENCE
2001-01-23
Notes by Joanna Lane

WG-Review Discussion of Basic Agenda
Constituencies - including IDNH and lack of representation for Registries.
GA -
NC -
Workgroups
Standardised Procedures - publish consensus rules applicable to this
wg-review, its agenda and timetable, immediately in advance of each topic
being addressed, via the list and on website. Suggestions for increasing
participation in teleconferences such as dialpad.com.
Outreach - topic to include multilingual issues
Funding -
Procedures - discussion of 1,2,3 as three separate topics, with draft
motions prepared at the end of each topic. There will then be a quick review
of all 3 to finalise motions, followed by voting. Volunteers will be needed
for each topic to collate comments and summarise for report.
Polling Booth: - Increase participation by focusing input to only one booth.
Joop's Booth is the most secure.
Presentation. Documents to be circulated as PDF attachments to reduce risk
of virus. Roeland has capability to convert.
Comments on Theresa Swinehart TF document: - Satisfactory, but need to fill
in blanks. Not everybody has found time to read document. Generally not in
agreement with attempts to cut WG-Review exercise short. Need adequate time
to present responses properly and not a valid exercise without translation/
outreach.
Use of Email in WG-Review process - medium dictates longer discussions and
make teleconferences inevitable. Newserver is more efficient as it allows
underlying organisation of input by using sub-groups etc. It's a proven
answer to the problems WG-Review is facing and software is free. Roeland to
provide Elisabeth with tech information to be passed to DNSO.org system
administrator with a request to install software. DNSO.net would support
distribution. For people on the move, newsgroups work better - no need to be
continuously online to access WebPages or use expensive mobile/long distance
lines.
Multi-lingual:- Alta Vista offer one solution at
http://www.babelfish.altavista.com/translate.dyn
ccTLDs: - only limited strategic, not tactical discussion within context of
funding and budgeting DNSO will be possible. Wg-Review needs to reduce risk
of recommendations being nullified and has limited resources. May require WG
of it's own. Members welcome to pose questions about ccTLDs through
WG-Review list, for Peter to liase with other ccTLDs, but no cross posting
by members to ccTLD list. ccTLDs need time to clarify their own position
through Hawaii and closed meetings with ICANN, but are interested in
preserving mechanism. This will be clarified in Melbourne.
DNSO incorporation - Refer Budget Task Force. URL: NC Budget Archives -
message no 230. Some NC members support change from political entity to
separate Delaware Corporation. Concerns raised include Antitrust issues,
DNSO setting itself up as competitor to other route server organisations,
also ICANN bylaws which state DNSO is not a separate entity. Elisabeth
suggested this came from KPMG Audit, which gave advice to keep DNSO budget
separate. Therefore, there was a need to open a bank account, collect funds
from constituencies and sponsors, to pay secretariat/ administration and one
person in charge of collecting information. Budget of $200,000? This issue
would be added to WG-Review of funding.
Present: Y.J.Park, Greg Burton (recused approximately 13.00 GMT), Danny
Younger, Peter De Blanc, Roeland Meyer, Elisabeth Porteneuve (joined 13.30
GMT), Joanna Lane, Rob Juno.




--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html