ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[wg-review] RE: [URGENT MOTION] 4:00 AM GMT to 8:00 AM US East Coast! for WG-Review Teleconference.


Ayia! Such last minute changes on a work-day are unreasonable! At 1700, I am
still scheduled on client-site. My Cell phone has no international
capability. My client is 50 miles from my office phone.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: yjpark@myepark.com [mailto:yjpark@myepark.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 8:37 AM
> To: jo-uk @ rcn . com
> Cc: Roeland Meyer; wg-review@dnso.org
> Subject: [URGENT MOTION] 4:00 AM GMT to 8:00 AM US East Coast! for
> WG-Review Teleconference.
> 
> 
> Hello WG members,
> 
> Can I make a urgent motion?
> 
> "WG-Review Teleconference on Jan 23 from 4:00 GMT to 8:00 US 
> East Coast."
> 
> 8:00 US East Coast, 14:00 CET, 22:00 Japan/Korea, 24:00 Melbourne)
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> Local time between November and end March, Winter in the 
> North hemisphere
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> Reference (Coordinated Universal Time)     UTC         12:00
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> California, USA                            UTC-8+1DST   5:00
> Missouri, USA                              UTC-6+1DST   7:00
> Monterrey, Mexico                          UTC-6+0DST   7:00
> Washington DC, USA                   (EDT) UTC-5+1DST   8:00
> St.Thomas, Virgin Islands                  UTC-4+0DST   9:00
> Santiago, Chile                            UTC-4+0DST  10:00
> Buenos Aires, Argentina                    UTC-3+0DST  10:00
> Nouakchott, Mauritania                     UTC+0+0DST  13:00
> London, United Kingdom                     UTC+0+0DST  13:00
> Brussels, Belgium                    (CET) UTC+1+1DST  14:00
> Barcelona, Spain                     (CET) UTC+1+1DST  14:00
> Frankfurt, Germany                   (CET) UTC+1+1DST  14:00
> Paris, France                        (CET) UTC+1+1DST  14:00
> Seoul, Korea                               UTC+9+0DST  22:00
> Tokyo, Japan                               UTC+9+0DST  22:00
> Melbourne, Australia                      UTC+10+0DST  24:00
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> 
> I have used this from DNSO secretariat timetable for NC 
> teleconference.
> If I cannot hear from you any further objection within a few hours,
> this will be finalized and will be announced properly.
> 
> Sorry for this last-minute change due to lack of previous 
> communication.
> 
> Thanks,
> YJ
> 
> > It is unreasonable to expect colleagues in Europe and N. 
> America to be
> > capable of functioning at their best between 4am and 7am or 
> Midnight and 3am
> > respectively, even if they are willing and able to attend. 
> I would suggest
> > 9pm-11pm GMT ( 4pm-6pm EST USA, 6-8am Wednesday EST Australia).
> > Joanna
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
> > Behalf Of Roeland Meyer
> > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 7:44 AM
> > To: 'YJ Park (MINC)'; wg-review@dnso.org
> > Cc: board@minc.org
> > Subject: RE: [wg-review] [Teleconference] WG-Review Teleconference
> > 
> > 
> > Logistics:
> > 1) How does one register for a port?
> > 2) Is there a further notification process?
> > 
> > Agenda:
> > 1) IMHO 4 and 5 are inter-tied. If we are considering the 
> MHSC suggestion of
> > abolishing the constituencies and having the GA elect all 
> the NC seats then
> > 4 becomes irrelevent. However, if we wish to consider some 
> compromise
> > proposal (making the GA another constituency), then we 
> still have to take 4
> > and 5 together. Only with status quo can we consider them 
> separately.
> > 
> > 2) I disagree that 8 has any place at this low a level. It 
> should be up at
> > ICANN BoD level because it is an ICANN-wide problem.
> > 
> > 3) WRT item 2, what next period?
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: YJ Park (MINC) [mailto:yjpark@minc.org]
> > > Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 10:28 PM
> > > To: wg-review@dnso.org
> > > Cc: board@minc.org
> > > Subject: [wg-review] [Teleconference] WG-Review Teleconference
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello WG-Review members,
> > >
> > > Appreciating MINC board who has approved to support
> > > DNSO WG-Review's teleconference upon the urgent request,
> > > I also would like to thank Michael Gendron who initially
> > > volunteered for the bridge and Greg who tried to sort out issues.
> > >
> > > I tentatively put 20 people for the teleconference,
> > > so it will be of help to notify your participation in advance
> > > not to avoid lack of ports just in case people cannot have
> > > proper access due to its limited lines.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > YJ
> > >
> > > ================================
> > > Date: 2001. 1. 23. Tuesday. 4:00 AM. GMT
> > > ================================
> > > Conference Tel : 65 - 668 - 7700
> > > Conference code:  517595#
> > > Duration: Two hours(with three hours reserved)
> > > ================================
> > > Conference Chairman: YJ Park
> > > No of Participants, WG-Review Members: 20
> > > ================================
> > > Draft Agenda:
> > >
> > > 1. Agenda approval
> > > 2. Schedule, Work Plans for Next Period
> > > 3. Preliminary Report Discussion and Approval
> > > 4. Constituencies
> > > 5. General Assembly
> > > 6. Names Council
> > > 7. Work Groups
> > > 8. Standardized Procedures and Language/Translation Issues
> > > 9. Outreach
> > > 10. Draft DNSO Review report, version 1.0
> > > 11. AOB
> > > ==================================
> > > Time Difference
> > > ==================================
> > > 4:00   GMT
> > > 24:00 New York Eastern Time
> > > 21:00 California
> > > 12:00 Korea, Japan
> > > 13:00 Singapore
> > >
> > > Please visit to
> > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/ for confirmation.
> > > ==================================
> > >                         [End of Message]
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > 
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>