RE: [wg-review] [Review] ccTLD vs DNSO vs ICANN vs GAC

["Peter de Blanc" <pdeblanc@usvi.net>]

Thant is in anteresting idea- and one which we have not thought about before
within the ccTLD-

we were kind of looking at it as one or the other (inside DNSO vs: separate)

I'm going to put that idea on the ccTLD list and see what our constituent's
thoughts are...

Peter de Blanc
AdCom, ccTLD

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
Behalf Of DPF
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 6:42 PM
To: wg-review@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [wg-review] [Review] ccTLD vs DNSO vs ICANN vs GAC


On Wed, 17 Jan 2001 22:21:34 +0800, YJ Park wrote:

>1. [DNSO Structure Discussion] ccTLD should be in the DNSO?

I think that the ccTLDs should both be a constituency within DNSO as
they have a huge interest in domain name policy but also be a
Supporting Organisation of ICANN with direct appointment of Board
Members in recognition of vital role in global recognition of ICANN,
and the large amount they fund it.

It is interesting that DNSO/ICANN has so far only made policy relating
to gTLDs.  A key question will be whether ICANN will attempt to make
global policy for ccTLDS (personally a silly thing to do and quite
possibly impossible to implement).

DPF
________________________________________________________________________
<david at farrar dot com>
NZ Usenet FAQs - http://www.dpf.ac.nz/usenet/nz
ICQ 29964527
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html