Re: [wg-review] Clarifications requested from BoD, Staff, NC,TC,Chair prior to co-Chair elections

["Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@register.com>]

The statement by the esteemed Mr. Crispin is not complete. The Courts and the
Attorney General and Secretary of State generally would intervene should such a
scenario exist. Just like a reorganization under bankruptcy laws, corporations
often get extremely well straightened out under direct court supervision. If all
of this talk of malfeasance on behalf of OUR corporation is true this will
eventually happen and not all to the bad either.
Sincerely,

Roeland Meyer wrote:

> > From: Kent Crispin [mailto:kent@songbird.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 3:08 PM
>
> > Fine.  So you bring a suit against the board for not following its
> > bylaws.  You get an injunction against the board not following the
> > bylaws.  The board amends the bylaws and proceeds with what it was
> > going to do.
>
> Seeing this, as a representitive sample of attitude. I am aghast. If this is
> really the way the ICANN BoD collectively feels, then there is no recourse
> but to call for the dissolution of the ICANN, as a failed experiment gone
> out of control.
>
> I have reasons for NOT wanting to see that happen. However, an organization
> that behaves so dishonorably, is not fit to continue its existance.
> Furthermore, such core dishonesty is impossible to deal with. Two years ago,
> ICANN asked us too trust it. While some of us had serious reservations,
> enough of us went along with it that the rest had to follow. The process
> described above is exactly the sort of thing folks were castigating NSI for,
> three years ago.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Emanuel.exe