Re: [wg-review] [DNDEF]

[Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

1/19/01 3:37:25 PM, "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be> wrote:

>My suggestion for a common point of agreement stands:
>"what is important is the intent of the domain name holder. Are they in good
>faith or bad faith? Do they seek fair DNS presence or do they seek to
>pretend to be what they are not?"

What about in cases of a trademark on a generic term, and a domain 
registration of said generic term, where the registrant of the domain puts it up 
for auction to the first bidder that meets their price threshold?   Is this "good 
faith" or "bad faith"?  As I pointed out in an earlier post, the terms "flu" and 
"headache" are trademarked, and not by P&G.  Is it ok for P&G to engage in 
selling such domains in an after market situation? 
 


Sotiris Sotiropoulos
          Hermes Network, Inc. 


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html