RE: [wg-review] Re(2): [cctld-discuss] Comments on review of DNSO by Mr Park

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

I think that we need clarifacation and re-focusing from the chais here. The
name of this WG is WG-Review. The ostensible charter is to review the
performance, or lack thereof, of the DNSO, overall.

Am I wrong here?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robin Miller [mailto:robin@minervan.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 12:59 AM
> To: el@lisse.na
> Cc: Oscar A. Robles Garay; wg-review@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [wg-review] Re(2): [cctld-discuss] Comments on review of
> DNSO by Mr Park
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
> 
> > No, I think we need to actually identify the people responsible for
> > the 240 odd ccTLDs and then try and contact them. I am 
> quite sure that
> > many of the listed names are not involved in the management of their
> > ccTLD.
> > 
> > greetings, el
> 
> This WG is about setting up an individuals constituency, not 
> about ccTLD
> constituencies. Now if the ccTLD's are interested in aiding with the
> translations, that's nice. But lets also be honest - DNS 
> operators are not the
> only individuals this WG is trying to reach out to. My domain 
> owning friend in
> Switzerland can barely understand English texts, and cannot 
> write in English.
> So that means she is shut out of this kind of process. There 
> are many more
> people like her, people like her that this WG is 'supposedly' 
> set up to reach
> out to. This is not the WG for registries or just DNS 
> operators. Its the WG to
> set up an individuals constituency.
> 
> 
> Robin
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html