ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [wg-review] 11. IDNH


Just testing. Thank you for making my point.
Joanna

Bukko write:-

The House of Lords abolition never got through - it was thrown out by - -
guess who?

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
Joanna Lane
Sent: 17 January 2001 03:35
To: Bret Busby
Cc: wg-review@dnso.org
Subject: RE: [wg-review] 11. IDNH

Bret Busby wrote:-
I was raised in new Zealand, with a single house of parliament (and,
first past the post elections). Parliament got laws passed, and, the
government of the day, governed. Then, I came to australia, which has a
two house parliamentary system, in each of the top two levels of
government. The elected government governs only at the pleasure of the
upper house, ahich may not be controlled by the elected government, thus
leading to an elected government not being allowed to govern, and, as in
an infamous incident, being thrown out by the upper house.

[Joanna] This is the reason why it was decided to abolish the House of Lords
in the United Kingdom, although I have to say that on occasion they have
brought common sense to the The House of Commons by throwing Bills back to
them for review .

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>