Re: [wg-review] [Review] ccTLD vs DNSO vs ICANN vs GAC

[Pilar Luque <pluque@nic.es>]

So that we stop bothering you with the multilingual question?

Pilar






bukko wrote:
> 
> I propose everyone on this list is sent to cover the Hawaii meeting at
> ICANN's expense.
> 
> bukko
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
> YJ Park
> Sent: 17 January 2001 14:22
> To: wg-review@dnso.org
> Subject: [wg-review] [Review] ccTLD vs DNSO vs ICANN vs GAC
> 
> Hello members,
> 
> As you read, Bill asked not to cross post wg-review message to
> cctld-discuss list. Please keep this in mind.
> 
> We have focused "Language Divide" and "Translation Cost" in
> ICANN process. As you may know, ccTLD is going to have a
> meeting in Hawaii to figure out what their future should be.
> 
> Since ccTLD constituency is in the DNSO structure at this juncture,
> it might be more productive to discuss bigger picture for WG-Review's
> recommendation to the Names Council.
> 
> 1. [DNSO Structure Discussion] ccTLD should be in the DNSO?
> 2. If not, what could be the potential model
> 3. [NET Sovereignty] If so, what kind of relations should there
>     be between ccTLD and ICANN
> 4. What kind of relations among ccTLD vs ICANN vs GAC
> :
> :
> 
> Thanks,
> YJ
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html