RE: [wg-review] Re: [cctld-discuss] Comments on review of DNSOby Mr Park

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

This is a much more workable solution, which I can support. However, there
is a minor nit, The ICANN is answerable to the USG, not the UN. Need I go
on?

> From: Nigel Roberts [mailto:nigel@nic.gg]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 2:09 AM
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> If ICANN were to insist only on operating in 
> (American) English, many countries would see that
> as a form of cultural imperialism.
> 
> 
> 
> Nigel
> Aurigny, les Iles Anglo-Normandes.
> 
> Annie Renard wrote:
> > 
> >  In your previous mail you wrote:
> > 
> >          If we put the issue of money aside are we all in 
> agreement that ICANN must
> >          work in a multi-lingual capacity?
> > ...
> > 
> > I agree, all the international organizations work in a 
> multi-lingual capacity :
> > UN (6), WIPO (3), EU (11), ...
> > 
> > Is ICANN really an international organization ? currently NO.
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html