ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] 11. IDNH


Joop Teernstra wrote:
> 
> On 14:16 15/01/01 -0500, Sotiropoulos said:
> >1/15/01 10:05:12 AM, Greg Burton <sidna@feedwriter.com> wrote:
> >
> >>It seems clear that there is widespread - almost consensus - support for us
> >>to recommend a constituency of some kind here.
> >
> >Actually Greg, I'd say that there was more widespread support for the
> dissolution of the constitency structure.  In fact it appears to be a
> majority, check it
> >out: http://pollcat.com/Lite/report.asp?report=report/tzk27voon5_a
> >
> 
> This is an important point. Important enough for a more formal poll.
> With permission of the Chair, I will put up four more polling questions in
> the Booth:
> 
> 1. Should in your opinion the constituency structure of the DNSO be
> abandoned altogether?
>  Yes/No/ No opinion
> 
> 2. If the Constituency structure is retained, do you favour the addition of
> an Individual DN Holder constituency?
> YES/NO
> 
> 3. If the  Constituency structure is retained, do you favour  a reduction
> of NC seats belonging to the existing constituencies and redistribution of
> seats in order to more evenly balance opposing interests?
> YES/NO/ other (please specify)
> 
> 4. If the Constituency structure is abandoned, how would you want to
> represent the Individual Domain Name holders on the Names Council?
> 
> -not at all
> -turn the GA into an electoral college for the NC
> -other: please specify on the comment line
> (multiple choice possible)
> 
> --Joop--
> www.idno.org

Before another poll is called (if it hasn't, already), could I have the
status and role of the constituencies clarified, please?

I understand, from what has been said, that the existence of the
constituencies is a necessary evil; that, without the constituencies, no
advocacy to the Names Council would exist; that the Names Council
members are appointed, without the constituencies, and, that removing
the constituencies, would ensure that an appointed board would be what
constituted the Names Council, with no-one being represented, other than
the body that appointed the NC board.

So, can I please have this all clarified, by someone on this list, who
knows; the current structure, and, the effect of exterminating the
constituencies?

I assume that the one named YJ (?), would be the one best qualified to
answer this.

Thanks in anticipation.

-- 

Bret Busby

Armadale, West Australia

......................................
"So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the
answer means."
 - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
 - Douglas Adams, 1988 
......................................
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>