Re: [wg-review] 11. IDNH - Clean Motion

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

Dear Chair, Greg,
I certainly understand that ignorance and enthusiasm in a new cause one 
believes to defend may lead to some mistakes. But it is not acceptable to 
use in a motion a text whose the author has recognized as an error. What 
may be acceptable as an humorous flame  becomes in this context such a 
incredible summ of absurdities that it unconsiders the whole WG-Review.

As an active Member of the @large international community and having 
presented the two initial motions that this text is supposed to oppose, I 
feel personnally concerned by the text proposed by Mrs. Joana Lane. I 
suppose that all the Members @large on his WG-Reveiw also feel hurt. All 
this is a perfect illustration of the post of Mr. Kent Crispin.

Jesey Morfin
Chair, france@large

On 19:23 15/01/01, Joanna Lane said:
> > > >The @large is
> > > >1.  a disorganized group of all Internet users' diverse interests.
> > > >2.  without Charter or Mission statement
> > > >3. without means of the members to contact each other
> > > >4.  subject to a Study that may reduce its representation on the 
> Board or do
> > > >     away with it altogether
> > > >5.  represented by Directors that may be representing interests directly
> > > >     opposed to typical DN holders' interests.
> > > >6.  top-down and controlled by ICANN staff.
> > > >7.  Unable to provide policy formulations to the ICANN Board


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html