RE: [wg-review] 11. IDNH

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

Greg,

Do I have to resubmit all the arguments against constituencies, under the
correct headers?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Burton [mailto:sidna@feedwriter.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 9:05 AM
> To: wg Review list
> Subject: [wg-review] 11. IDNH
> 
> 
> It seems clear that there is widespread - almost consensus - 
> support for us 
> to recommend a constituency of some kind here.
> 
> Could Joanna or someone please prepare and post a clean 
> statement of the 
> current motion for inclusion of material? I believe that was Chris or 
> David's motion and the statement of differences between 
> atlarge and a dnso 
> constituency.
> 
> Has that motion been seconded? If so, then I'd like Joop to 
> prepare a vote 
> on it. I think everyone has had plenty of time to discuss the 
> concept - 
> everything else is details of structure and implementation. 
> Perhaps taking 
> that discussion to the GA list could involve more affected 
> people, and also 
> reduce the volume here.
> 
> Regards,
> Greg
> 
> sidna@feedwriter.com
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html