Re: [wg-review] Clarifications requested from BoD, Staff, NC, TC,Chair prior to co-Chair elections

[Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>]

On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 08:30:43PM -0700, Greg Burton wrote:
> At 07:46 PM 1/11/01, Eric wrote:
> >Kent Wrote:
> >That is, the vast representational gap claimed by some is a pure fiction.
> 
> Well now.....to quote the White Paper:
> 
> "The Board of Directors for the new corporation should be balanced to 
> equitably represent the interests of IP number
>     registries, domain name registries, domain name registrars, the 
> technical community, Internet service providers (ISPs),
>     and Internet users (commercial, not-for-profit, and individuals) from 
> around the world. Since these constituencies are
>     international, we would expect the board of directors to be broadly 
> representative of the global Internet community. "
> 
> Internet users, Kent - NOT domain name registrants. Internet USERS. 
> Individuals described as a CONSTITUENCY.

The board of directors (to which that paragraph refers) includes 5 
members directly elected by the users.  What's your point?


> Every other category of entity in 
> that paragraph has been recognized, either in an SO or as a constituency. 
> The White Paper categorizes individuals with commercial interests and 
> non-profit interests as a desirable constituency. And no, I'm NOT confusing 
> that with at large.

Looks to me like you are.

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html