Re: [wg-review] Clarifications requested

["YJ Park \(MINC\)" <yjpark@minc.org>]

> I will confirm this statement.  All four of us (candidates) agree that
> some order must be established and that we must focus our energies on
> addressing the to-date identified issues.  Each of us is committed to
> ensuring that this is accomplished in an efficient and timely manner,
> however, I seriously doubt that we'll be meeting the Jan. 15 deadline.
> Although Ms. Park has posted a few somewhat confusing messages which may
> be interpreted as a WG extension, I wonder if someone in the know may be
> able to clarify this matter for us.

Yes, let me confirm it again.
My position to let review WG have enough working days has not been
changed at all since I make motion to NC, which is also documented in
Dec NC teleconference.

If there was any confusion regarding this, I reaffirm with you and review
WG,
that was originated by my English mistake.

FYI, another aspect of this Review working group just like WG B and C,
it is hardly to see non-native English speakers except Europe. This is the
another "Challenge" ICANN should do overcome, too.

Thanks,
YJ

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html