Re: [wg-review] [IDNH]Membership criteria

[Eric Dierker <ERIC@HI-TEK.COM>]

From what I have seen to date the elected members of the board are doing their
job.  I feel very confident that once the IDNH is established that board members
elected as a result of the constituency being in place will likewise do their job.
I thought that by voting for the constituency on the polling site we were
basically insuring that it will become a reality.
Sincerely,

J J Teernstra wrote:

> At 14:56 9/01/01 -0500, Joanna Lane wrote:
> >Members will naturally self-organize into groups once the list becomes
> >unmanageable under the opposing model a. Under this model, (model b) you are
> >imposing a barrier to entry in that Individuals would have to join yet
> >another group/ association before membership of IDNH was allowed. I don't
> >support this "top down" model for that reason.
> >
> Joanna,
>
> I strongly agee with allowing factions or parties to form naturally around
> principles and personalities.
> For model B. someone (the NC?) would still have to create an entire
> constituency charter, specifically dealing with an organization composed of
> multiple organizations. This is far from a trivial exercise.
>
> Each of these organizations would have to have charters as well, to be
> created from scratch and to be approved by the .
> Looking at the time it took the NCDNHC to agree on their charter, you are
> talking about at least a year to accomplish that.
> A giant step back from what we have now. For what??
>
> As of now, we have already a charter that has been much discussed (fought
> over) and ratified by a large number of typical Individual DN owners.
> The membership criteria that Joanna distilled from the IDNO site are workable.
> Charter modifications have a straightforward procedure.
>
> >I agree with Chris and David 100% this needs further discussion after the
> >consituency is in place, but first we need to agree there is to be IDNH
> >constituency (did we do that by formality yet?)
>
> It is currently up on the Polling Site for everybody's vote.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
begin:vcard 
n:Dierker;Eric
tel;fax:(858) 571-8497
tel;work:(858) 571-8431
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:Eric@Hi-Tek.com
end:vcard