Re: [wg-review] Karl's assigned objective.

[J J Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com> wrote:

>In our modern parlance:
>
>    "A person registers a domain, they can vote.  The domain gets taken 
>    away in a UDRP action, they can no longer vote..."
>
Your turn for a strawman argument. Of course a sensible DN Owners
constituency has some flexibility built in.

>It is utter nonsense to think that only domain name registrants should 
>be allowed to be members of *any* constituency.
>
>
Strong words, but not strong argument.

We are talking about a DNSO constituency. Domain Names are what makes us
part of the DNSO.

Utter nonsense is to talk about "allowing" , when any interest group with a
stake in the DNSO has the right to conceive itself as a constituency of
interests and to petition the ICANN Board for constituency status. 

Joop Teernstra, LL.M.
the Cyberspace Association
the Individual Domain Name Owners'constituency
www.idno.org


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html