Re: [wg-review] [IDNH]Membership criteria

[Bret Busby <bret@clearsol.iinet.net.au>]

DPF wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 7 Jan 2001 23:18:10 -0500, Joanna Lane wrote:
> 
> >I would simply say either
> >a)  "IDNH constituency membership is open to any person who is an individual
> >domain name holder" or
> >b) "IDNH constituency membership is open to any group of individual domain
> >name holders"
> 
> They are the two basic models.  One could actually have a model which
> allows both but that can complicate things.  There are pros and cons
> to each model of course.
> 
> I have been watching carefully and so far I have not seen a single
> person oppose the principle that the DNSO should have an IDNH
> constituency.  In fact to my great pleasure several members of the
> Names Council have explicitly posted in favour of this.
> 
> In terms of our report due 15 January we need to consider whether we
> just report consensus on the principle of an IDNH constituency (and
> hopefully a recommendation on how to progress it) or if we have time
> to debate the merits of the two models above and try and achieve
> consensus on the basic model for such a constituency.
> 
> DPF
> 

I am a new subscriber to this mailing list.

I object to domain name holders being treated any differently to anyone
else, having been cheated out of a gTLD domain name, to which I was
entitled, due to the prohibitive procedures for dispute resolution, the
domain name having been knowingly sold by a registrar, to a domain name
pirate. Why should pirates also be able to gain elitist privileges over
the people that they rob?

-- 

Bret Busby

Armadale, West Australia

......................................
"So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the
answer means."
 - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
 - Douglas Adams, 1988 
......................................
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html