RE: [wg-review] The Number 1 Problem

["Peter de Blanc" <pdeblanc@usvi.net>]

well said, Karl!

Peter de Blanc

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
Behalf Of Karl Auerbach
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 6:25 PM
To: wg Review list
Subject: Re: [wg-review] The Number 1 Problem



> > I support the determination of group opinion by the use of solid
> > procedures that include the placement of clearly articulated issues
before
> > a clearly formed electorate who make clear votes that are counted.
> >
> > As it stands, as a member of the ICANN Board of Directors, I am very
> > unlikely to give credence to any matter that comes out of the DNSO
unless
> > I see objective data indicating that the DNSO has reached its conclusion
> > by something better than the hand waving that has to date been called
> > "consensus".
>
> You know, this is the very first time I have seen of a member of the BoD
> blatantly using their position in an attempt to influence the direction
> of a supposedly bottom up process.

Get used to it.

Would you prefer that I have secret criteria?

I was elected on a platform of open, transparent, and accountable
processes.  If you object to the fact that I'm willing to disclose my
criteria, then you can simply not listen.


> Tell you what, Karl, why don't you just tell us what we are supposed
> to produce?

No problem:  The DNSO is to produce well reasoned policy decisions based
based on fair and objective processes that permit all interested parties
to participate on an equal basis.

		--karl--





--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html