RE: [wg-review] The Number 2 Problem

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

 From this may we support a second proposition by this WG-Review:

"
The WG-Review has observed that reaching a consensus within the DNSO was 
basically hampered by the lack of definition and therefore of comon 
understanding of what a DNSO consensus is and how it is determined.
"

Jefsey

On 17:12 05/01/01, Milton Mueller said:
>No, we don't "have to" work with it. And the problem,  is that no one 
>seems to know what it (consensus) means anyway. I agree with Karl. 
>Well-stated rules, clear-cut votes on clearly stated issues. That's the 
>way to proceed.
>
> >>> "Eric" <eric@springbreaktravel.com> 01/05/01 10:58AM >>>
>Regardless of how any of us feel about consensus, it is the structure that 
>that we have to work with for this WG.

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html