Re: [wg-review] The Number 1 Problem

[Greg Burton <sidna@feedwriter.com>]

At 02:09 PM 1/5/01, Sotiropoulos wrote:
>I think this list has already achieved about the only consensus we're 
>likely to achieve: we all agree that a review of to-date DNSO and NC 
>agendas, initiatives and directions is important enough to warrant our 
>participation in this WG.

I believe that is incorrect. No one has yet argued against the "consensus 
training" proposal - even those who don't think consensus is achievable. 
Near-consensus has been achieved on the desirability of a constituency for 
"personal/individual domain name holders", and serious discussions are 
occuring on other topics.

>This having been said, let me offer up something which may help to 
>initiate some movement in our discussion:
>Towards a definition of a domain name:

While this is an important issue and one of great interest to many of us, 
it is both outside any reasonable interpretation of the charter for this 
WG, and off-topic for this thread. Could you help us focus on our mission - 
whichever one of them we're operating under?

Thanks,
Greg


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html