ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [wg-review] The Number 1 Problem


My mistake, it was my understanding that DNSO had specifically stated that
the consensus model was what we were to use to develop our final report.

-----Original Message-----
From: Milton Mueller [mailto:Mueller@syr.edu]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 11:12 AM
To: wg-review@dnso.org; kent@songbird.com; eric@springbreaktravel.com
Subject: RE: [wg-review] The Number 1 Problem



No, we don't "have to" work with it. And the problem,  is that no one seems
to know what it (consensus) means anyway. I agree with Karl. Well-stated
rules, clear-cut votes on clearly stated issues. That's the way to proceed.

>>> "Eric" <eric@springbreaktravel.com> 01/05/01 10:58AM >>>

Regardless of how any of us feel about consensus, it is the structure that
that we have to work with for this WG.




--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>