Re: [wg-review] who is a legitimate member of this list?

[ERIC@HI-TEK.COM]

Ms. Chairwoman is this an accurate reflection of the goals?

Sotiropoulos wrote:

> 1/4/01 12:38:17 AM, "Peter de Blanc" <pdeblanc@usvi.net> wrote:
>
> >This WG is supposed to be DNSO review. Am I making the incorrect assumption
> >that all participants in the list are or should be  DNSO constituency
> >members?
>
> Here's what the ICANN announcement says:
> "ICANN's Names Council
>       Renews Call for Wide Consultation on Consensus Building
> December 21, 2000 - To get additional input
>       into a review of its own consensus-building procedures, the Names
>       Council of ICANN's Domain Name Supporting Organization (DNSO)
>       at its December 19 meeting established a Review Working Group
>       charged with actively seeking input from the widest possible
>       set of Internet stakeholders.
> The new working group, chaired by Names
>       Council member Y J Park, is established immediately and seeks
>       to complete its work by January 15th 2001. In common with previous
>       DNSO work groups, the group is open to anyone to participate
>       and operates by e-mail. Interested parties are encouraged to
>       sign-up now by sending an email to majordomo@dnso.org with the words subscribe wg-review in the body of the message."
>
> But don't take it from me... visit the page yourself: http://www.icann.org/announcements/icann-pr21dec00.htm
>
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>           Hermes Network, Inc.
>
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html