Re: [wg-review] Bill of Particulars

[Greg Burton <sidna@feedwriter.com>]

At 11:07 AM 1/3/01, Digitel - Ken Stubbs wrote:
>your comment is well taken here. it would not be appropriate for me to
>involve myself in the self-formation process, yet i can still express my
>concern to those involved in same and receive assurances that, as an
>individual, i would be welcome to participate in the future and make my
>views known

Thanks for your reply, Ken. I'd like to paraphrase you here, and make sure 
I understand you clearly. I'm not trying to put words in your mouth, so if 
I've got it wrong please correct me.

"Because I am a member of  Existing Constituency, I should not involve 
myself in the formation of New Constituency. However, I am also a potential 
member of New Constituency. As such, I should be able to express my views 
about the  proposed structure, and be able to determine for myself, and 
comment on, whether or not it will address the concerns I have as a 
potential member."

Is this a fair statement of your position?

Regards,
Greg


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html