ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] Bill of Particulars


More progress on the list...

Structural and/or Procedural Problem areas within the DNSO that impede its
mission of becoming a bottom-up
policy coordination body:
1. Unrepresented constituents.
2. Unrepresentative constituencies.
3. Process does not encourage compromise among parties  with competing
positions.
 4. The process is not producing adequate documents for the board.
5. No agreed definition for "domain name"
6. No agreed definition for "end user" and "real end user"
7. Poor clarification of issues that ICANN has charter to address that
directly affect "end users".
8. Process does not encourage compromise among parties  with competing
positions.
9.  Arguable the weighting of constituencies (currently all are equal) on
Names Council is inappropriate?  How can one decide what is appropriate and
who decides?
10. GA feel marginalized and powerless.




-- Rod


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>