<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Partitioning of interests
Please, please, please,
let review the icann.org site for:
1. White Paper
2. MoU
3. By laws
4. @large Members pages
5. Staff Document on @large Study
6. Decisions by BoD, Santiago, Cairo, Yokohama, MDR, ....
7. different letters by Barabra Simons, Thomas Roessler, Hans Klein, Jefsey
Morfin, etc...
8. http://icann-fra.org
etc... etc... etc...
@large is everything BUT an DNSO constituency!
DNSO has beein tricked by Joe Sims in confusing with @large. DNSO has
NOTHING to do with @large.
The whole mission of this WG is to disantangle the DNSO from its @large
past imposed mix-up!
Jefsey,
Chair, france@large
On 15:37 02/01/01, Michael Sondow said:
>Peter de Blanc wrote:
> >
> > There IS a constituency for individuals-
> >
> > it is the At-Large!
>
>Please describe the mechanism by which the @large "constituency"
>participates in the DNSO's origination of domain name policy.
>
>Thanks.
>
>M.S.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|