Re: [wg-review] Ten Topics of Review WG
Thank you for your suggestions here.
After your proposal, it appears that this group is keen on 11.[IDNH]
however, it's hard to see any specific response to 12 and 13 except
James Wright's second.
> - 11. [IDNH] individual domain holder constituency, Report requested by
> WG-Review Members
> - 12. [STLD] specialized TLD constituency, Report requested by WG-Review
> - 13. [DNSO/GA Chair election] Report requested by WG-Review Members
Therefore, it would be productive not to handle 12[STLD] in this process and
it would be of help to have more detailed consulation with GA regarding 13
[GA Chair Election] before this group fully start its review process.
> To initiate these threads I will copy this WG-Review list the mail sent to
> other specialized mailing lists.
> Jefsey Morfin
> On 05:48 28/12/00, YJ Park said:
> >Additional issues and concerns can be freely discussed if the necessity
> >arises such as General Assembly Chair election process.
> >To make discussion more effective from now on, whenever members
> >circulate the message to the list, it is recommended for members to
> >specify the subject title out of ten here. - the subject can be expanded
> >subject to the requests by members.
> >1. [Charter] Review Process Background and Charter Discussion
> >2. [Outreach and DNSO] Report requested by NC
> >3. [Constituencies] Report requested by NC
> >4. [GA] Report requested by NC
> >5. [Working Group] Report requested by NC
> >6. [Secretariat] Report requested by NC
> >7. [Names Council] Report requested by NC
> >8. [WG A, B, C and DNSO] Report requested by NC
> >9. [DNSO Quality] Report requested by NC
> >10. [The Board and DNSO] Report requested by NC