RE: [wg-review] 5. [Working Group] Report requested by NC

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

The WG's are the only thing that has been shown to work. I don't see the
difference between a WG and a TF. IOW, they are synonymous, IMHO. Thus far,
while a WG may not meet all of its objectives, it does seen to always reach
a consensus.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: YJ Park [mailto:yjpark@myepark.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 8:55 PM
> To: wg-review@dnso.org
> Subject: [wg-review] 5. [Working Group] Report requested by NC
> 
> 
> Working Groups:
> 
> · Are the working groups an appropriate mechanisms to foster 
> consensus in
> the DNSO?
> 
> · If the NC can't find consensus in a working group report, 
> what should be
> the next step?
> 
> · Are there mechanisms other than working groups that the NC 
> should employ
> in managing the consensus-development process? For example, 
> assigned task
> forces?
> 
>