Re: [wg-review] 11 [IDNH] individual domain name owners, Report requested by Members of the WG-Review

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

"Once again, the question isn't whether people can *comment*. The issue is 
if  ATT/IBM/SAIC fly the plane."

Dear Joana,
you see the kind of debate we could get rid of in having the DNSO turning 
professional:

On 19:35 30/12/00, Kent Crispin said:
>For example, the Internet
>technical community overwhelmingly rejects the notion of "alternate
>roots", but there is a significant community of people who actively
>promote various "alternate root" schemes.  None of these people are
>involved in the actual design of the DNS protocols, and very of them are
>really technical heavyweights in any aspect of the Internet, but they
>believe that they are, and that is all that matters.

Hi! Kent,
Could you be specific about what you mean:
- notion of "alternate root", would you mean technically "augmented root"
- or politically Jon Postel followers?

May be you would like to complete your sentence. Is it?
- "and many of them are really technical heavyweights" ...
- ro "and very few of them are like me really technical heavyweights" ...

I am sure you will share with us all in asking Suzane Woolf to update the 
SSRAC report pages and get some CRADA information if you know the 
heavywheight people involved. Might help, thank you.

Jefsey