[wg-review] Rough Proposal A & B

["Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M." <rod@cyberspaces.org>]

I think my last comment was misunderstood. I think all proposals that are
presented should be considered by this WG. I am hoping, however, that the
consensus proposal include *realistic* recommendations.  We should be
mindful of the practicalities of what we are doing and why.  A WG within the
DNSO does not strike me as the proper forum for certain reform efforts.
Having said that, I certainly respect the opinions of those who disagree.
There are 2 rough proposals on the table. I recommend we consider expanding
upon those or eliminating one and/or have additional rough proposals
presented.


> We seem to have to rough proposals on the table regarding
> constituencies:
>
Rough Proposal A
>   - Elimination of formal/official constituencies and replacement of
>     that with a one-person-one-vote mechanism (my approach)
>
Rough Proposal B
>   - Creation of objective criteria for the recognition and continued
>     existence of official constituencies (including those already in
>     existence) - individuals and small businesses being two examples of
>     constituencies that would probably quickly arise. [addition] There
should also be
semi-yearly evaluations that an official constituency continues to meet
those rules
>
> My own sense is that continuation of the status quo is a non-starter.
>
> --karl--
>

Rod