Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Reformulation Questions

[Greg Burton <sidna@feedwriter.com>]

At 01:36 PM 12/29/00, Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M. wrote:
>It will be difficult to compare the various positions without understanding
>what problem is being solved by the proposal.

Agreed.

>I think a proposal should be  directed toward
>fixing this problem, rather than addressing what are probably structural
>issues beyond the scope of this WG.

On 10:35 PM 12/22/00, YJ Park said:
>The DNSO Review Working Group's objective is to evaluate
>the performance of ICANN's DNSO and to propose structural
>and procedural changes that will help ICANN's Domain Name
>Supporting Organization fulfill its mission of becoming a bottom-up
>policy coordination body.

Looks to me like structural changes are appropriate to address here. :)

Regards,
Greg
sidna@feedwriter.com