<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Report requested by NC
At 11:16 AM 12/29/00, Kent Crispin wrote:
>Please note that the purpose of this WG is to identify ways to make
>the DNSO more productive. That purpose is not at all served by trying
>to change the fundamental structure of the DNSO.
Unless the "fundamental structure of the DNSO" is part of the problem. Many
people seem to think it is.
> Instead, such attempts are certain to be disruptive in the extreme, and
> to totally paralyze the
>DNSO.
Kent, it already appears paralyzed - that's part of the problem then, isn't it?
Regards,
Greg
sidna@feedwriter.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|