Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Report requested by NC

["Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M." <rod@cyberspaces.org>]

SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS

Although I am not inclined to agree that there should be unequal
constituencies in the DNSO for purposes of getting a seat at the NC, I think
that debate should follow the initial question concerning structure. It
looks like we have at least two proposals: 1) that the "official"
constituency structure be abandoned, and open constituencies replace them;
2) that the current constituency structure be liberalized to allow any
constituency to join the DNSO based on a list of objective criteria of
representation; 2a) if the constituency structure is liberalized, criteria
should be established to determine the appropriate number of seats on the NC
for each constituency.

Please correct me, where I have erroneously restated your position or missed
someone. It might be worthy stating a position on these suggestions first
(and any others on this question of structure).

Proposal 1- Karl

Proposal 2 - Rod

Proposal 2a - David


Rod