Re: [wg-review] Time line for this WG should extend to 20 Feb, 2001 at a minimum.

[DPF <david@farrar.com>]

On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 02:25:37 -0500, Peter de Blanc wrote:

>I propose that this WG communicate to the Names Council that, In order to
>give proper consideration to the subject, and allow a fair and equitable
>opportunity for full International participation, the timeline for output
>run through 20 February 2001.
>
>This is still in plenty of time for Melbourne. Also, It is unlikely that the
>new US secretary of commerce is going to make any substantive moves while
>this work is in process.

Fully support this.  Even without that quaint little custom known as
Xmas/New Year getting in the way the timeframe is ridiculous.  We
certainly can do a report by 15 January but IMO it would be
significantly lower quality than if one had more time.

DPF
________________________________________________________________________
<david at farrar dot com>
NZ Usenet FAQs - http://www.dpf.ac.nz/usenet/nz
ICQ 29964527