ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[wg-review] Bounced message from Joop


Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 13:38:50 +1300
To: wg-review@dnso.org
From: Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>
Subject: Agenda

Dear all,

Now I've been allowed in...

There is precious little time.
The past (for my eyewitness report of the Singapore events please refer to
www.idno.org/singapore.htm) can be best visited outside this WG.

We have a Chair.

Can we come up with an Agenda that can be meaningfully addressed in less
than 20 days?

Can we start with the key issue? 
The insufficient representation for DN holders on the NC?

Should there be an eighth constituency for Individual DN holders, or should
some of the overlapping and duplicated interests be collapsed into single
constituencies?

If the IP constituency stays as is, would its relative influence in the NC
increase too much? Should they be entitled to only one NC rep?

Just a few questions for starters. 
I am sorry if I have duplicated what has already been posted. The first
posting that I have seen after my admittance here is Mr Sondow's.






--Joop Teernstra LL.M.--  
the Cyberspace Association and 
the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
Elected representative.
http://www.idno.org  




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>