Re: [wg-review] constituency composition

[WWWhatsup <joly@dti.net>]

> Milton Mueller wrote:
> >
> > Let's throw this idea out immediately. We don't assign entire
> > constituencies to individual organizations. If we start doing that,
> > then let's have an ACM constituency, and IBM constituency, and a
> > Syracuse University constituency (all of which have more members than > ISOC).

an essential difference is that those others do not have
a mission statement that goes:

"To assure the open development, evolution
and use of the Internet for the benefit of all
people throughout the world."


Michael Sondow wrote:
> 
> Agreed. And how about creating a new constituency for true
> non-commercial domain name holders, since the current NCDNHC is
> controlled by ISOC? At present, there is no constituency in which an
> honest-to-god non-commercial domain name holder, whether individual
> or organization, can function openly and effectively.
> 
> M.S.

ISOC is an open organization. Effectiveness of members
is their own responsibility.

-- 
**************cut when replying*****************   
___________________________________________
  WWWhatsup  NYC  -  http://pinstand.com      
 http://punkcast.com - http://streamola.com
___________________________________________