Re: [wg-d] "Interim Measures"

[Karl Auerbach <karl@CaveBear.com>]

> > The public and the constituencies are, of course, welcome to participate
> > in this group, as well as to comment via the GA review.  (As I will
> > continue to point out, the NC has utterly no power under the ICANN bylaws
> > to review the substance of what we do beyond answering the simple question
> > "is there consensus?")
> 
> And you will continue to be incorrect.

You fail to indicate any ICANN by-law that gives the NC the power you
claim for it.

And it is very clear from VI-B (2)(b) and VI-B(2)(d) that the NC
merely measures consensus and has no policy voice whatsoever.

As usual: Karl: 1, Kent 0

		--karl--